United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303
Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:
“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.
The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States?’
Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be “money” in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or “currency.” Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not “money.” A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not “money?’ The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, -gold and silver coin.
It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any “money.” Most Americans have not been paid any “money” for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are “bankrupt,” along with the rest of the country?
Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). when ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.
Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) – a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.
There is a fundamental difference between “paying” and “discharging” a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of “good & valuable consideration.” Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.
Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations.
The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a “Canon Law Trust” as their model, adding stock and naming it a “Joint Stock Trust.” The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal “person” to duplicate a “Joint Stock Trust” in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3]
The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.
Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.
Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)
“Hypothecated” all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit “money substitute” it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves”, the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.
This has been going on for over eighty years without the “informed knowledge” of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it’s easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.
Why don’t more people own their properties outright?
Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?
We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.
America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country.”
Deborah Tavares
THE UNITED STATES REJECTED AGENDA 21 ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO.
Conspiracy promoters falsely claim that Agenda 21 is a U.N scheme which will drive us out of our rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated “Kill Cities” in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, none of this is so.
Agenda 21 was a non-binding suggestion that the United Nations recommended to all its member nations in 1992. Under the United States Constitution, both the President and the Senate must consent to a proposed international treaty or convention before it becomes law in the United States. While the President symbolically signed Agenda 21, the Senate withheld its consent to Agenda 21.
As a result, the United Sates government, as a whole, REJECTED Agenda 21 almost 30 years ago. That means Agenda 21 never applied in the United States and does not apply here now. So, whatever Agenda 21 “would have done” if it not been REJECTED is completely irrelevant. It was REJECTED.
Likewise so-called “Agenda 21 Map” is entirely FAKE and had nothing to do with Agenda 21 in the first place. Instead, the fake “Agenda 21 Map” was an exaggeration created to generate United States Senate opposition to “The U.N. Treaty On Bio-Diversity” (something entirely different from Agenda 21). As it turned out, the United States also rejected The U.N. Treaty On Bio-Diversity. So, neither Agenda 21 nor The U.N. Treaty On Bio-Diversity (to which the fake Agenda 21 Map allegedly related) ever applied in the United States. BOTH WERE REJECTED.
FOR PROOF, CLICK ON POST #5 HERE. REMEMBER, POST #5 HERE. Google “The Hoaxes Of Deborah Tavares”, or click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?130336-The-hoaxes-of-deborah-tavares-(conspiracy-weaponized-weather-fires-depopulation)&p=226016
I thought that you should know.
All My Best,
Snoop
DEBORAH TAVARES: THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT. MUST SEE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQZmq_vMcSQ
DEBORAH TAVARES &THE FAKE PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).
More Deborah Tavares hoaxes here.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares
THE HOAX: In the PG&E FAKE Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have
obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent
fires in California by beaming energy beams from satellites in space
at California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are
FORGERIES.
VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not
involved in the hoax)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb–FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)
Pacific Gas & Electric (“PG&E”) is a California electrical utility
company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate
an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power
without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly
resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical
power.
But, PG&E’s conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect
energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good
weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels
on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun
24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in
the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then
be received at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to
electricity for use by its customers.
WHAT PG&E ANNOUNCED IN 2009:
https://www.pge.com/en_US/small-medi…se_link-energy
Solaren is a private California company which has patented the
technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with
Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever
successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under
the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its
satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally,
Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016.
But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any
electricity, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities
Commission (“CPUC”) approved the contract on the condition that no
money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.
THE CONTRACT:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n…/#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at paragraphs 1-5)
https://www.afcea.org/content/space-…closer-reality(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a…-light-of-day/(at the final two
paragraphs)
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac…r-earth-2014-7(at the final two
paragraphs)
Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has publically opposed PG&E
because of its “smart meters”. So, when the recent forest fires burned
northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the
technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a
problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this
technology did not yet exist.
CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See
the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here.
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac…r-earth-2014-7
This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR…olar-Power.pdf
This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph.
https://www.electricityforum.com/new…ospaceforpower.
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST
paragraph here. http://earthsky.org/earth/space-base…ser-to-reality
This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62
http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/…e_12-14-16.pdf
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph.
http://www.alternative-energy-news.i…ls-into-orbit/
SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE
emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this
beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that
it could be used to kill us all.
THE FORGERIES:
1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES:
http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2…rn-california/
Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting
imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares
allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these
imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam
technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it
could be used to kill us all.
2. TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20%
THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/
3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)
Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES
which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE “PROOF” that PG&E used this
future beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill
us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.
THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. Tavares did not know what “space weather” actually was (something a
REAL PG&E executive would know). “Solar flares” on the surface of the
Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend
millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of
radiation into space. This radiation is called “space weather” (like a
“rain” or “storm” OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth’s
atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The
radiation emitted during such “space weather” is so powerful that it
can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if
they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in
power outages. That is why “space weather” would be of concern to
PG&E. During “damaging space weather”, PG&E has to protect its
transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such
transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to
hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.
DEBORAH TAVARES’ MISTAKE:
But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed
that “space weather” was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire)
that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio
frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE
(a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).
HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
In FORGING the phrase “…then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS,
AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING
SPACE WEATHER]” in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring
to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS
CUSTOMERS (not realizing that “damaging space weather” is actually
radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the
Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences
resulting from “damaging space weather” is actually power outages, NOT
FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER
OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE
SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did
not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be “blamed” for the
“consequences” of “damaging space weather”, WHICH IS ONLY POWER
OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake
proves that this email is a FORGERY.
2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E’s contract
with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah
Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or
control any such satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any
say in how, when or where energy from satellites in space would be
directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of
that. Under the contract, all PG&E would ever do would be to buy
finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in
generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E
is simply a future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah
Tavares did not know this.
HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
So, in FORGING the sentence, “WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR
receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol” in the 10:03
email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she
was so important to PG&E that it actually “targeted” her with radio
frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her
opposition to PG&E “smart meters”. See PROOF here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you
kidding me?! What a narcissist!
Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E had no ability to
aim Solaren’s energy beams or to move Solaren’s receptor station from
one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).
This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren’s actual receptor
site is in Fresno, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert
(something a REAL PG&E executive would know).
PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n…/#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at the 3rd paragraph)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a…-light-of-day/ (at end of 2nd paragraph)
https://www.electricityforum.com/new…ospaceforpower (at the 16th paragraph)
Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas
are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it obvious to every
person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated
there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).
Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren’s receptor
site as “OUR” receptor site, would know that Solaren’s receptor
station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that
PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren’s receptor site. The
foregoing mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.
3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email, how likely is it
that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a
“reminder” of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren’s
technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E’s use of
Solaren’s technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its
customer’s money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a
“reminder” of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren’s technology in
which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This “reminder”
serves NO PURPOSE.
4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would
refer to PG&E’s customers as “EARTHLINGS” in connection with an email
about a “COVER UP” of “damaging space weather” which can cause nothing
but power outages?
5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would
tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS “AKA EARTHLINGS” FOR
THE CONSEQUENCES OF “DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER”, WHICH IS ONLY POWER
OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE
BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS. This mistake proves that this email is a
FORGERY.
THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS
ARE FORGERIES:
1. The sentence, “You as a California resident have every right to
know what your “public utilities” are doing with their (sic) “RATE
DOLLARS”, was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares
fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no “rate dollars”
from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the
research and development of Solaren’s technology (which will be
financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract,
PG&E would merely be a future customer of Solaren and buy finished
electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating
electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will
ever be used to develop Solaren’s technology. But, Deborah Tavares did
not know this when writing this FORGERY. That mistake proves that this
email is a FORGERY.
2. The term, “EARTH, INC.” in “comment ONE:” a “signature” term
ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares.
https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…iz.42h9ExblMs8
3. The phrase, “very disturbing” in “comment TWO:” is a “signature”
Deborah Tavares phrase.
https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.ld2pLLtGq-c
4. The term, “FOIA”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah
Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.MsKCoGqM1QE
5. The term, “iceberg”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah
Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.brv_lDgjd1o
6. The term, “footprints”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah
Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.6jJyS4QOIyw
7. The term, “assessment”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah
Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…iz.VQSLXAWgla8
8. BOTH “comment ONE:” and “comment TWO:” contain hyphenated terms (”
– “), a writing custom rare in today’s world, suggesting that BOTH
comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of
course, they were.
PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from
satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned
extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES
(upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular
claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are
FORGERIES!
ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online
hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah
Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to
reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts
upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah
Tavares’ role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have
revealed this information here.
The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The
truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The
truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported
by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a “good
reason” to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make
a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.
THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES RELATING TO THESE FIRES
For proof. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares
1. “The NASA War Document Hoax”. The document is REAL, but has been “modified” to fit the hoax. It now has a FAKE and misleading TITLE and COVER. But, the hoax is NOT the document anyway. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares’ OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES “PROOF” that NASA is already killing us all with diabolical weapons in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. NASA actually created and used this very document to urge American defense contractors to develop countermeasures against the diabolical weapons described therein in an effort to prevent any planned extinction of mankind.
2. “The Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax”. The document is REAL, but it is only POLITICAL FICTION. It has also been “modified” to fit the hoax. It now has a FAKE, recently-added paragraph at the beginning which fraudulently indicates that it is the work of “The Bilderbergs”. But, the hoax is NOT the document anyway. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares’ OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES “PROOF” that “The Bilderbergs” adopted a plan in 1954 to kill us all with diabolical “silent weapons” in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. This document is actually POLITICAL FICTION and is a DISGUISED COMPLAINT about the treason and horrors suffered by U.S. soldiers when the U.S. government allegedly allowed them to be killed at Pearl Harbor in order to draw us into World War II. This 44 page booklet has NOTHING to do with the Bilderbergs.
3. “The Report From Iron Mountain Hoax”. The document is REAL, but it is only POLITICAL SATIRE. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares’ OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES “PROOF” that ALL “environmental calamities” (including climate change, drought, fires, etc.) ARE FAKE (“engineered”) and that they are created by the U.S. Government to justify “FAKE WARS” (described in the book) against these FAKE (“engineered”) environmental calamities to prop up the U.S. economy and that the U.S. Government uses these FAKE (“engineered”) environmental calamities as “weapons” to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. This document is actually POLITICAL SATIRE and is a DISGUISED COMPLAINT WHICH OPENLY MOCKS U.S. policy of engaging in perpetual wars to prop up the U.S. economy. The premise of the book is that if we ever run out of REAL enemies to justify our wars, we will have to make up FAKE enemies (like “FAKE environmental calamities” and “FAKE alien life forms”) to justify our wars.
4. “The Agenda 21 Hoax”. The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares’ OWN fraudulent claims that THE DOCUMENT ALONE, ALL BY ITSELF, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTES “PROOF” that the United Nations is forcing us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated “Kill Cities” or “Smart Cities” in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so. According to the “Agenda 21” document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), its purpose is to SLOW DOWN the rate at which the environment is destroyed. It would have PROTECTED THE REMAINING FORESTS, REDUCED DROUGHT and INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE. Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the “EARTH SUMMIT” (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. It was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. Agenda 21 does not apply in the United States because it is not the law in the United States and therefore cannot be enforced in the United States. Contrary to Deborah Tavares’ fraudulent claims, there is NOTHING in the Agenda 21 document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) which suggests we will be forced out of our rural or suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated “Kill Cities” or “Smart Cities” in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. NOTHING!
5. “The PG&E Satellite Beams Hoax”. THE DOCUMENTS ARE FORGERIES AND THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THOSE FORGERIES ARE VERIFIABLY FALSE. PG&E is a California electrical utility company which collects and generates electricity in a variety of ways. But, PG&E’s conventional solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future it would use solar panels on satellites in space to collect energy from the Sun 24 hours a day, then beam it to earth using lasers or radio frequencies and then convert it to electricity here on earth for its customers. When the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and this technology for starting those fires. But, the scientific literature and PG&E’s own documents indicated that this technology did not yet exist. SO, TO REBUT ALL THAT INFORMATION, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to start fires. Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE “PROOF” that PG&E used this technology to ignite the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about these FORGED emails are not so. These FORGED EMAILS prove nothing except that Deborah Tavares is a fraud.
6. The Genocide Agreement Hoax”. The document is REAL. So, the hoax is NOT the document itself. The “Genocide Agreement” is actually the nickname of a proposed 1940’s United Nations agreement BANNING GENOCIDE among signatory nations. The proposed “Genocide Agreement” DEFINED “GENOCIDE” BROADLY and also banned the displacement of people from their homes. Further, under the proposed “Genocide Agreement”, the United Nations would have the jurisdiction to criminally prosecute and punish individual CITIZENS of signatory nations who violated the terms of the agreement (like the Nuremberg Trials and The Nuremberg Hangings). All nations on earth (including the United States) wanted to ban genocide. But, the United States had concerns about signing the “Genocide Agreement” because of THE OTHER ACTS that it banned and because it delegated to the United Nations the jurisdiction to criminally prosecute and punish American citizens who violated its provisions (like at Nuremberg). Southern states in particular were concerned that the agreement might subject opponents of racial integration to the criminal jurisdiction of the United Nations. Regardless, in the 1980’s the United States signed the “Genocide Agreement”, despite these concerns. So, the hoax is not the document itself. Instead, the hoax is Deborah Tavares’ OWN fraudulent claims that the Genocide Agreement ONLY BANS “NATIONS” FROM COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE and that THE UNITED STATES IS “NOT A NATION”, BECAUSE “IT IS A CORPORATION” (which is not governed by the agreement or the ban) which permits the United States to commit genocide on a “Day-by-Day” basis, which is why “WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED”. THE TRUTH: But, the United States is not really a “corporation” and the Genocide Agreement actually bans genocide in the United States and subjects those who commit genocide and displacement to the criminal jurisdiction of the United Nations. The hoax is also Deborah Tavares’ OWN (ENTIRELY INCONSISTENT) claims that the genocide agreement DOES APPLY IN THE UNITED STATES and that it “INVADES DOMESTIC LAWS” and “ALLOWS FOREIGNERS TO ‘OVER-RIDE’ U.S. laws”. (Note that if the Genocide Agreement really “DID NOT APPLY” to the United States because it is a “CORPORATION” as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims above, it would be impossible for the Genocide Agreement to apply in the United States which would make it impossible for the Genocide Agreement to “invade” or “over-ride” any law in the United States.). THE TRUTH: Regardless, the Genocide Agreement applies in the United States, but only over-rides U.S. law as to the specific acts banned by the agreement, GENOCIDE and DISPLACEMENT. Nothing more.
ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares’ role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.
For more on Deborah Tavares, CLICK HERE. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares
Where is she now? That’s what will make ir break this.
Geez! I just read the comments on this interview and am amazed how differing my ‘take’ is versus theirs: I though Richard did a great job of asking the right questions PERIOD. Rude? No way! His delving in for details on one ‘dot’ establishes the root concept, which enhances understanding of other like ‘dots’ of information. Details imprint the mind and make it real. A broad sweep of a series of dots conveys information, but it is intellectual, not FELT. The listener then needs a prior background of detailed information to feel the connectivity of this series of dots. We as humans are FEELING beings, we use our feelings to learn what’s real.
This is the worst interviewer I have listened to.
He is rude and interrupts and embarrassed me for these very professional and patient woman.
Don’t bother listening.
Yes, he is by far the worst interviewer – even worse than Bill Deagle. Richard Hoagland just LOVES to hear himself talk. I could not stand his constant interruptions and had to shut it off without even hearing Elena. I will NEVER listen to another interview from Hoagland again.
This comment area is being heavily censored. Will see if this comment posts. Firstly, this Hoagland character seems in no way really interested in getting the truth out. Seems he just wants to rudely and constantly interrupt. His “show me the proof” rubbish speaks volumes in his intentions. He also treats his audience as mindless people who cannot grasp the simple concept of doing a search on their own. Never heard of him before and will never again waste my precious time and energy on someone so self-absorbed. His only goal was to act like he had the Rosetta Stone hiding in his “report” but I will never bother with it b/c he annoyed me to the point of a migraine. Deborah Tavares was never able to get all of the information out that she had wanted to b/c he couldn’t keep his mouth shut long enough for her to get a sentence finished. His blathering about the “millenials” coming in to government to make huge changes made me literally laugh out loud. Either he has no clue how the puppet government works or he’s very much aware and has an agenda of his own. His website makes it appear that he is aware but his mouth tells a different truth. Perhaps he IS aware but he’s on the wrong side? That’s what it feels like anyway. Never heard of this man or his website or show before and I will never bother with it again.
Dear Charity,
The comment section is NOT censored….it is also NOT on automatic…to keep out sex porn spam.
That means I, Kynthea, must manually go in and read each one and approve. Mind you…I am a volunteer already maxed out. So sometimes it may take a day to get a comment visible. Your are welcome to read the stream of comments from this show…see also Older comments.
I don’t know what was going on with Richard last night…usually he’s a fabulous interviewer.
I wouldn’t write him off so fast…everyone has days when they’re off balance.
It’s easy to throw mud when you are invisible…and hard to please everyone when you are sooo visible.
Kynthea
He used to be a regular commentator guest on Coast2coastam until George Noory took over. I don’t think George appreciated Richard’s condescending attitude.
[…] Is Earth Under Attack – and If So… Who’s the Enemy?! […]
I continued listening in spite of my irritation, and it got much better. I can understand why Hoagland wanted Tavares to slow down and provide more details because she has had a tendency to rush through her information. However, it would have been preferable if he had forewarned her he was going to be asking a lot of questions and requesting a lot of detail because at first it almost seemed like he was giving her the “bum’s rush” , though he continued to be condescending in tone, which DOES NOT help!
Hoagland seems to think that his listeners are idiots who need to have every single point explained to them in minute detail. Has constant and very rude interruptions of Deborah are so irritating, I’m only a fraction of the way through the program and doubt if I will be listening to anymore, despite the fact that I would very much like to hear what Tavares and Freeland have to say. BUT NOT HOAGLAND!!!
I shared the link with the caveat that Hoagland is being INCREDIBLY rude.
Deborah, please extricate yourself from these horrible ego-driven males who insist in interrupting you when they interview you. They have no interest in getting the truth out.
I lost interest in Richard Hoagland long ago during his days appearing on the Art Bell program. The man just LOVES to hear himself talk endlessly, and I’ve heard him sensationalize news stories (which later turned out to be pure BS). I always felt that he needed his own show, but obviously, he just cannot stop talking and he does not understand how to conduct a professional interview. Constant interruptions, sidetracking her with stupid questions about trivial points and even delaying the interview to push his other material for sale just ruined it for me. Deborah is very skilled at articulating her info in a clear, very understandable way, and it was apparent that she was becoming annoyed with his relentless interruptions. She had a very difficult time even completing a sentence. If the man would PLEASE just learn to shut his mouth, this program could be so much more listenable. Deborah could have provided TWICE the info she discussed here. I will NEVER tune in to this fool ever again.
Richard, it is very irritating when you continually interrupt your guests. Do you believe that your listeners are so low brow that they can not comprehend the guest? Please let the guest speak!
There have been several times when I disconnected because of your constant interruptions.